Latest Financial Planning News

Hot Issues
Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
Leasing property owned by an SMSF
A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
Your 30 June superannuation checklist
Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
Comparison of various Animal Weight
$95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
Financial abuse move now a certainty
Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
Trustees warned on early access
The Largest Empires in the World's History
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions

The Division 296 impost has prompted SMSF members looking at retaining assets in super to consider the tax impact of their death on their beneficiaries.



.


More SMSF members are looking at the effect of death benefit taxes on their beneficiaries as part of their consideration around whether to move assets out of superannuation to avoid the impact of the proposed Division 296 impost, according to administration provider Heffron.


Heffron managing director Meg Heffron said recent discussions with clients on the Division 296 tax had expanded to include issues such as where to move assets outside of super and estate planning.


“One of the most useful things about Division 296 tax being threatened, even if it’s never introduced, is it’s really focused the mind of a lot of people who have kept money in super because it’s a good tax deal and don’t want to take it out, and the government doesn’t make them take it out anymore,” Heffron said during a recent practitioner briefing.


“What they’re doing is running the gauntlet on death benefit taxes.


“A lot of the conversations I’ve been having with clients about this has been: ‘If I have this tax, which doesn’t necessarily make me worse off in super than outside super, and with that money over $3 million I don’t mind taking it out of super because at least I’m protecting my beneficiaries from that death benefit tax.’”


She said the issue of death benefit taxes arises because if a member moves assets out of superannuation, they are dealt with by the will, but where they are retained in super, they can have an impact on those receiving a death benefit from the fund.


“One of the things that has the biggest detrimental impact on wealth is dying with a whole heap of money in super and no spouse to leave it to,” she said.


“Usually, if there’s no spouse, it’ll end up with adult children or other beneficiaries that are not dependants and they pay very high rates of tax on most death benefits and that will end up dwarfing any Division 296 tax.


“I think in the end, we’ll end up having a very productive discussion about death benefit taxes prompted by something completely different, which is Division 296.”


 


 


 


June 26, 2025
Jason Spits
smsmagazine.com.au




28th-July-2025