Latest Financial Planning News

Hot Issues
Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
Leasing property owned by an SMSF
A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
Your 30 June superannuation checklist
Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
Comparison of various Animal Weight
$95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
Financial abuse move now a certainty
Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Quarter 4 of 2023
Articles
Working after pension age
Does the NALI/E punishment fit the crime?
EPOA crucial for SMSFs, says professional adviser
Economic and market outlook for 2024: Global summary
Five investing tips for beginners
Setting up the next generations of retirees
A 2023 Advent Calendar for our clients
Most Expensive Wars In History
ATO takes hard line on in-house asset rules
How to budget using the 50/30/20 method
SMSFA says proposed super legislation will hit farmers, small businesses the most
Investment and economic outlook, October 2023
The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
Teaching children about the value of money
Most powerful countries throughout time.
Retirement is not just about dollars
Unfair Terms in a Standard Form Contract
Too many businesses roll the dice on tax debt: Jordan
Revised NALE rules ‘miss chance to clarify SMSF bugbear
6 simple rules will ensure a deed can be executed in all states
Our investment and economic outlook, September 2023
The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
High deposit rates, but the case for equities is strong
Most powerful LEADERS of All Time
Unfair Terms in a Standard Form Contract

As a business owner, you probably enter into contracts every day. Contracts are crucial as they document and govern the relationship between your business and various parties. It is common to offer the parties you interact with the same or similar contracts. These are examples of a standard form contract.



.


While standard form contracts assist business efficiency, it is essential to take into account the terms of the contract and determine whether or not they are fair. This article explores unfair terms in standard form contracts, including how to identify and avoid them.


What is a Standard Form Contract?


Before considering unfair terms, it is important to first understand what constitutes a standard form contract. There is no statutory definition for a standard form contract. However, certain factors must be taken into consideration. Those factors include whether:


  • one of the parties have all, or most of, the bargaining power in the transaction;
  • one party prepared the contract before any discussion between the parties about the transaction occurred;
  • the other party was required to either accept or reject the terms of the contract in the form in which they were presented;
  • another party had the opportunity to negotiate the terms of the contract; and
  • the terms of the contract take into account the circumstances of the transaction or other party.

A contract is considered to be standard form if:


  • it is for the supply of goods, services, or land;
  • one (or both) of the parties is a small business with fewer than 20 employees; and
  • the contract price is not higher than $300,000 (or $1 million if the contract is for more than one year).

A standard form contract may not always be called standard form. It may also be known as a boilerplate contract, a contract of adhesion or even a take it or leave it contract. Despite the different names, it is the types of clauses that determine whether the contract is a standard form.  


ACCC v JJ Richard & Sons Pty Ltd


For a long time, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has been clamping down on unfair contract terms imposed on consumers by bigger businesses. Recently, the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) has broadened that scope to include contracts involving small businesses.


In late 2017, the ACCC brought a case against JJ Richard & Sons Pty Ltd. They found some overly-strict terms in JJ Richard’s standard contract. Those terms gave the company the freedom to increase prices, change the scope of work and prohibit customers from ending the contract in certain circumstances. The ACCC argued that the standard contracts gave JJ Richard too much freedom and imposed too many restrictions on small businesses.


What is an Unfair Term?


Whether you are on the giving or receiving end of a contract, there are going to be strict clauses. They are strict to ensure that there is as much clarity as possible about the relationship, rights, obligations and expectations of the parties. However, these strict terms may, in some circumstances, be unfair. According to the ACCC, unfair contract terms will:


  • let only one party avoid their obligations under the contract;
  • allow only one party to end the contract;
  • punish only one party for breaching any terms; and/or
  • enable only one party to change the contract.  

Ultimately, a contract will have unfair terms if it is overly restrictive on one party and provides the other with too many liberties. You should not impose unfair terms in standard form contracts onto other parties. Nor should you accept unfair terms. Courts will not accept clauses if they are unfair, place harsh obligations on the business or are otherwise unreasonable.


Key Takeaways


Contracts are an essential part of conducting business. It is vital to ensure that they contain terms and conditions that are fair to other parties. There is a delicate balance between protecting your business and taking advantage of other parties. The issue of unfair contract terms is one of which to be especially aware if your business is using standard form contracts. Therefore, it is best practice to have a lawyer look over your standard form contract to determine whether any of the terms are unfair or unreasonable.


 


 


 


Jessica Anderson
Senior Lawyer
legalvision.com.au




29th-October-2023